Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Australian Open 2020 (glavna tema)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • evo ga i Roger

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • "The GOAT"?!
      Nije li malo pretenciozno?
      Šampioni se ne stvaraju u teretanama. Šampioni se stvaraju od nečega što imaju duboko u sebi- želju, viziju i san. M.Ali
      Ko sme taj može.Ko ne zna za strah taj ide napred.
      "When the crowd is chanting Roger I hear Novak."

      Comment


      • Nije
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

        Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

        sigpic

        Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
        with experience.

        Comment


        • Šta nije?
          Nije pretenciozno?
          Ja koliko znam bar dvojica aktivnih tenisera imaju šanse da ga nadmaše...ipak je on stariji 6-7 godina od njih pa ako budu i oni igrali do 39 ne da će da ga nadmaše nego će baš da ga nadmaše.
          Jedan čak ima šansu već u toku ove godine da ga nadmaši...
          I kako jednom GOATU fale neki turniri...
          Najtrofejniji jeste ali najbolji svih vremena nije.
          Šampioni se ne stvaraju u teretanama. Šampioni se stvaraju od nečega što imaju duboko u sebi- želju, viziju i san. M.Ali
          Ko sme taj može.Ko ne zna za strah taj ide napred.
          "When the crowd is chanting Roger I hear Novak."

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Joker View Post
            Bojana, vidje li ti sta uradise Cilkan i Raona? A sta mi rece ti za obojicu?

            Fedja se izvukao za medalju. Milman od 8:4 do poraza.. Mada, do 8:4 je dosao nekim nenormalnim poenima, imao je par stvarno fenomenalnih pasing shotova, ne moze ono stalno.. Ali svaka cast liku na cijelom mecu. Kako on voli da muci Fedju, pa ono nije normalno. Meni je fascinantno kako u forhend ramjenama on ukroti Federera, nista mi nije jasno.. a da ti forhendi nisu nista jaci, cini mi se, nego Federerovi. Cak mi djeluje da on visocije gadje, neki veci luk imaju njegovi udarci i opet Fedja nikako da napadne te lopte. Ne razumijem koja je magija u pitanju...

            Svarcman.. Brate, kako me iznervirao covjek. Nisam gledao samo prvi set, ali Dule je ostavio bas dobar utisak i ovog puta. Bar na mene. Ali ona pcelica nemoguca je stvarno tezina jedna, uzas ce biti ako Novak udje u njegov ritam. Morace da ga pokida, sto sa servama, sto sa skracenim loptama.. ali prebacivale sa onim malim zvrkom nece nista dobro donijeti, pa ne znam kakve uglove Novak da gadja.
            Nisam stigla da ti odgvorim, trebao mi je odmor posle danasnjeg meca

            Uglavnom, mnogo me je vise iznenadio Cilic nego Raonic. Raonic je igrao svoj standardni smaracki tenis, udarao servise, ali je Cicipas bio skroz pogubljen, nije ima ideju sta da radi na riternu (mislim da ce on imati velike probleme sa takvim serverima) i Raonic ga je bas rutinirao.
            Cilic je ipak imao Aguta, mislila sam da Cilic sigurno nema u sebi nivo da se nosi sa njim, sa razmenama i to je jos poznato da Agut nece nista da pokloni i da nece da se preda. Po meni, mnogo vece iznenadjenje od pobede Raonica nad Cicipasom.
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Marija81 View Post
              Šta nije?
              Nije pretenciozno?
              Ja koliko znam bar dvojica aktivnih tenisera imaju šanse da ga nadmaše...ipak je on stariji 6-7 godina od njih pa ako budu i oni igrali do 39 ne da će da ga nadmaše nego će baš da ga nadmaše.
              Jedan čak ima šansu već u toku ove godine da ga nadmaši...
              I kako jednom GOATU fale neki turniri...
              Najtrofejniji jeste ali najbolji svih vremena nije.
              Od cele zajebancije, ti si nasla nesto negativno da izvuces i da udjes ponovo u raspravu ko je GOAT.
              Tako da odgovor na tvoje pitanje je: ne, nije preteciozno
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                Od cele zajebancije, ti si nasla nesto negativno da izvuces i da udjes ponovo u raspravu ko je GOAT.
                Tako da odgovor na tvoje pitanje je: ne, nije preteciozno
                Vrlo pretenciozno...
                Kao i menjanje podloga, prijateljstvo i saradnja (sukob interesa) sa Kregom Tilijem i milion drugih stvari...
                Ne znam...možda bi i ti ovako reagovala da je neko za Novaka ili Nadala napisao GOAT...

                I za kraj, ne ulazim u raspravu vodim dijalog...ako je rasprava nešto negativno,a zapravo je samo iznošenje mišljenja na temu koju si sama otvorila postavljanjem tvita, onda ne vidim poentu da mi drugi koji nismo za Rodžera bilo šta i komentarišemo na forumu ili bar na teniskom PDFu.
                Šampioni se ne stvaraju u teretanama. Šampioni se stvaraju od nečega što imaju duboko u sebi- želju, viziju i san. M.Ali
                Ko sme taj može.Ko ne zna za strah taj ide napred.
                "When the crowd is chanting Roger I hear Novak."

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Marija81 View Post
                  Vrlo pretenciozno...
                  Kao i menjanje podloga, prijateljstvo i saradnja (sukob interesa) sa Kregom Tilijem i milion drugih stvari...
                  Ne znam...možda bi i ti ovako reagovala da je neko za Novaka ili Nadala napisao GOAT...

                  I za kraj, ne ulazim u raspravu vodim dijalog...ako je rasprava nešto negativno,a zapravo je samo iznošenje mišljenja na temu koju si sama otvorila postavljanjem tvita, onda ne vidim poentu da mi drugi koji nismo za Rodžera bilo šta i komentarišemo na forumu ili bar na teniskom PDFu.
                  Pa neka napisu, sigurno necu da poludim zbog toga i krecem u neku raspravu, a postovan je zajebantski video

                  Menjanje podloga, a podloga savrseno odgovara Djokovicu, ali bukvalno je napravljena za njega ali valjda 1000 puta ponovljena laz postaje istina, vidjamo to svuda, zasto ne bi i ovde
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                  Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                  sigpic

                  Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                  with experience.

                  Comment


                  • Podloga pravljena za Đokovića
                    Podloga odgovara Novaku baš kao što mu odgovaraju i mnoge druge jer je univezalac ali nikad nije i neće se za njega neka praviti.
                    sigpic

                    Comment


                    • Da si objektivan, kao sto nisi, shvatio bi da je ovo idealna podloga za njega.
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                      sigpic

                      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                      with experience.

                      Comment


                      • The Twilight Zone
                        Halo Novak. Tili ovde
                        Evo završeno.
                        Sve je kako si tražio.
                        Ne, nemoj se zahvaljivati, za tebe šta god poželiš.
                        sigpic

                        Comment


                        • Ne, nego je kao sto ti mislis, Roger trazio podlogu, ali ovi pogresili i stavili presporu
                          Isto kao i sa zrebom, da su kojim slucajem Agut i Cicipas bili kod Rogera i da su obojica ispali kao sto se danas desilo, bilo bi: Tiley ponovo sredjuje zreb
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                            Cilic je ipak imao Aguta, mislila sam da Cilic sigurno nema u sebi nivo da se nosi sa njim, sa razmenama i to je jos poznato da Agut nece nista da pokloni i da nece da se preda. Po meni, mnogo vece iznenadjenje od pobede Raonica nad Cicipasom.
                            Previse gledas trenutnu formu, umjesto ponekad da bacis pogled i na to koliko neko lezi nekom. Cilkan je vec vodio 4:2, sad vec 5:2 protiv tog nezgodnog Aguta. Mats je dobro rekao u jednoj pauzi, mislim pred zadnji set: "Marin ima vecu igru (bigger game), ali tezu za realizovati."
                            A za Raonu sam rekao da ocekujem da tresne Cicija iz razloga sto mislim da je ta izgubljena generacija bas kivna na ove mlade momke o kojima cijeli svijet danas prica kako ce napokon da skinu skalp velikoj trojci. Jer njihove karijere su izgubljene zbog velike trojke, a sad ce neka mladjarija da gradi svoje na njihovom zgaristu. E nece da moze!

                            edit: Daj, oporavljaj se Nishikori, bar ti, kad Marej ne moze.. čisti ovu balafurdiju!
                            Last edited by Joker; 24-01-20, 21:24.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Joker View Post
                              Previse gledas trenutnu formu, umjesto ponekad da bacis pogled i na to koliko neko lezi nekom. Cilkan je vec vodio 4:2, sad vec 5:2 protiv tog nezgodnog Aguta. Mats je dobro rekao u jednoj pauzi, mislim pred zadnji set: "Marin ima vecu igru (bigger game), ali tezu za realizovati."
                              A za Raonu sam rekao da ocekujem da tresne Cicija iz razloga sto mislim da je ta izgubljena generacija bas kivna na ove mlade momke o kojima cijeli svijet danas prica kako ce napokon da skinu skalp velikoj trojci. Jer njihove karijere su izgubljene zbog velike trojke, a sad ce neka mladjarija da gradi svoje na njihovom zgaristu. E nece da moze!
                              Pa moram da gledam i trenutnu formu, Cilic igrao ocajno celu proslu sezonu, ATP Cup je isto ocajno odigrao, a Agut odigrao jednu od najboljih sezona u karijeri, tj. najverovatnije i najbolji i odlican bio na ATP Cupu. Nisam ocekivala da ce Cilic da nadje ovakav nivo samo 10 dana posle ATP Cupa, gde se mucio sa top 100 igracima i jos izgubio od Pelje.

                              A Raonic mi nije neko ogromno iznenadjenje, Cicipas je los na riternu, danas je bas delovao izgubljeno, nije imao pojma sta da radi, a i on je u padu forme jos od polovine prosle godine. Doduse, jeste odlicno odigrao WTF, ali ipak mislim da to nije onaj Cicipas iz prve polovine 2019.
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • rodja goat? mozda u nekom drugom univerzumu.. sta on to drzi, koliko znam samo gs i n1 ali i to nece jos dugo pa cemo da vidimo za koju slamku ce posle da se hvataju [emoji23][emoji23]

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X