Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nitto ATP Finals London 2019.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Samo sto publika nije protiv Djokovica samo kad igra protiv Rogera, kao sto bi se po ovim postovima moglo zakljuciti, nego je uglavnom protiv njega, protivnik je nebitan.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by DinoFC View Post
      Moguce da ako se njih dvojica budu sretali jos, da ce taj faktor sve vise i vise igrati kljucnu ulogu. Jer je vidno koliko Federeru znaci a ujedno igra bolje na krilima te podrske a Djokovic sve manje i manje moze izvuci nesto za sebe iz tog navijanja. Tako da u sljedecim mecevima ne treba zanemariti taj faktor jer je vidno da Djokovicu smeta kad na prvi poen pocnu da padaju u trans.
      To je samo tako na tribinama, sad pogledas drustvene mreze i razlika uopste nije tolika koliko bi se reklo po tribinama, Nadal i Djokovic nemaju sta da traze sto se tice podrske na samom mecu, ali u svijetu je ta razliak sigruno manja, cak sam siguran da Nadal ima vise navijaca globalno, a ne vjerujem da i Djokovic mnogo zaostaje, Indija i Kina su ogromna podrucja, Rusija, spansko govorno podrucje isto. Medjutim na tribinama je veci stalez, ljudi koji imaju novca, Zapad uglavnom, a tu je uglavnom Federerova podrska. Zato ce oni navijati protiv DJokovica na svakom mecu. Ipak to nije odlika pravog stanja, ali oni su uporni, kao zombiji koji idu i govore brains
      sigpic

      Comment


      • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
        Samo sto publika nije protiv Djokovica samo kad igra protiv Rogera, kao sto bi se po ovim postovima moglo zakljuciti, nego je uglavnom protiv njega, protivnik je nebitan.
        Razumijem sta zelis reci ali nivo ludila i navijanja je ubjedljivo najveci kad igra protiv Rogera pa jebote ljudi u 2 gemu skacu ko ludi na duple greske. Cista anarhija a ne navijanje

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Vladan View Post
          To je samo tako na tribinama, sad pogledas drustvene mreze i razlika uopste nije tolika koliko bi se reklo po tribinama, Nadal i Djokovic nemaju sta da traze sto se tice podrske na samom mecu, ali u svijetu je ta razliak sigruno manja, cak sam siguran da Nadal ima vise navijaca globalno, a ne vjerujem da i Djokovic mnogo zaostaje, Indija i Kina su ogromna podrucja. Medjutim na tribinama je veci stalez, ljudi koji imaju novca, Zapad uglavnom, a tu je uglavnom Federerova podrska. Ipak to nije odlika pravog stanja, ali oni su uporni, kao zombiji koji idu i govore brains
          U Kini je Fed popularniji od Djokovica, apsolutno nije istina da je tamo Djokovic popularniji.
          ali kapiram da vam je lakse da se tesite da je Djokovic covek iz naroda, zak ojeg navijaju posteni, a za Feda navija zli zapad i snobovi
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

          sigpic

          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
          with experience.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by DinoFC View Post
            Razumijem sta zelis reci ali nivo ludila i navijanja je ubjedljivo najveci kad igra protiv Rogera pa jebote ljudi u 2 gemu skacu ko ludi na duple greske. Cista anarhija a ne navijanje
            Ali juce uopste nije bio takav haos, jednostavno mec je bio previse jednosmeran za neki haos.
            Ali sad Djokovicevi navijaci svaki zvizduk analiziraju, sve gledaju, idu u krajnost...
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Maxx-a View Post
              U najmanju ruku izjava nezrele osobe. Šta bi bilo kad bi bilo i da je bilo
              Rekao je i da je publika bila "nice" . Što se iz meča nikako nije moglo zaključiti. Baš naprotiv.

              Meni je mnogo teže pao poraz od Dominica
              Teško se ono na tribinama može nazvati teniskom publikom. Klasična razularena rulja koja traži krv idolovog im protivnika. Oni ne da nemaju trunku poštovanja prema jednom velikanu kakav je Novak već ga mrze iz dna duše. Nadam se da će sa Federerovim povlačenjem oni nestati sa tribina.
              sigpic

              Comment


              • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                Ali juce uopste nije bio takav haos, jednostavno mec je bio previse jednosmeran za neki haos.
                Ali sad Djokovicevi navijaci svaki zvizduk analiziraju, sve gledaju, idu u krajnost...
                Pa pravili su haos onoliko koliko je bilo potrebno u odlucujucim momentima oba seta. Zbog manjka neizvjesnosti nije bilo to sve u punom kapacitetu. I definitivno Federerova penzija ce oznaciti kraj toj rulji, ali na to cemo morati sacekat.

                Comment


                • pogledajte ovo, posebno kad naleti na nase ljude, na 2:07

                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                  Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                  sigpic

                  Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                  with experience.

                  Comment


                  • Instagram

                    Federer 6.9m
                    Nadal 8.1m
                    Djokovic 6.3m

                    Twitter

                    Federer 12.7m
                    Nadal 15.7m
                    Djokovic 8.7m

                    Siguran sam da globalno Nadal ima najvise navijaca, ali veci stalez je Federerov. Djokovic se ipak dosta kasnije pojavio i bas u jeku rivalstva izmedju Federera i Nadala i opet uspio da uzme ogroman dio baze.
                    sigpic

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by DinoFC View Post
                      Pa pravili su haos onoliko koliko je bilo potrebno u odlucujucim momentima oba seta. Zbog manjka neizvjesnosti nije bilo to sve u punom kapacitetu. I definitivno Federerova penzija ce oznaciti kraj toj rulji, ali na to cemo morati sacekat.
                      Nece, teniska publika se promenila, to nema veze sa Rogerom, jednostavno se ceo svet promenio.
                      Pa vidi sta su Medvedevu radili na USO, ali on je to odradio maestralno, najverovatnije ce navijati za njega kao ludi sledece godine.
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                      sigpic

                      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                      with experience.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                        Ali juce uopste nije bio takav haos, jednostavno mec je bio previse jednosmeran za neki haos..
                        Zajebavas to po malo, drugarice? Pogledaj Larisin post na Novakovoj temi, vidi sta neki ljudi iz svijeta tenisa misle o tom "umjerenom haosu". Ocigledno je da su pravi ljubitelji tenisa bili uskraceni za vrhunski mec, jer je publika jednostavno bila bez trunke respekta prema jednom sampionu. Kada je glasniji aplauz na njegovu servis gresku nego na njegov dobar poen, sta tu ima vise da se prica.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Joker View Post
                          Zajebavas to po malo, drugarice? Pogledaj Larisin post na Novakovoj temi, vidi sta neki ljudi iz svijeta tenisa misle o tom "umjerenom haosu". Ocigledno je da su pravi ljubitelji tenisa bili uskraceni za vrhunski mec, jer je publika jednostavno bila bez trunke respekta prema jednom sampionu. Kada je glasniji aplauz na njegovu servis gresku nego na njegov dobar poen, sta tu ima vise da se prica.
                          Ne zajebavam, vama je sad dobra publika samo ona koja je protiv Federera, a to se nikad nece desiti.
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Joker View Post
                            Zajebavas to po malo, drugarice? Pogledaj Larisin post na Novakovoj temi, vidi sta neki ljudi iz svijeta tenisa misle o tom "umjerenom haosu". Ocigledno je da su pravi ljubitelji tenisa bili uskraceni za vrhunski mec, jer je publika jednostavno bila bez trunke respekta prema jednom sampionu. Kada je glasniji aplauz na njegovu servis gresku nego na njegov dobar poen, sta tu ima vise da se prica.
                            Ali opet to im nije pomoglo svih ovih godina, posebno u mecevima protiv Djokovica na Slemovima, tako da je na kraju dana skoro sve na Djokovicu, ako je maksimalno spreman i fokusiran pobijedice, ako nije nece i to je to.
                            sigpic

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                              Ne zajebavam, vama je sad dobra publika samo ona koja je protiv Federera, a to se nikad nece desiti.
                              Uvijek igrati na domacem terenu je ogromna prednost, bukvalno su svi prosli kroz to da je publika sa tribina protiv njih sem Federera, bilo bi zanimljivo vidjeti kako bi reagovao, ne tako dobro vjerujem. Tako da on u startu ima prednost, a to nije posteno.
                              sigpic

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                                Ne zajebavam, vama je sad dobra publika samo ona koja je protiv Federera, a to se nikad nece desiti.
                                Da rezimiramo.. tebi je normalno onakvo navijanje, jel da?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X