Samo sto publika nije protiv Djokovica samo kad igra protiv Rogera, kao sto bi se po ovim postovima moglo zakljuciti, nego je uglavnom protiv njega, protivnik je nebitan.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nitto ATP Finals London 2019.
Collapse
X
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
-
Originally posted by DinoFC View PostMoguce da ako se njih dvojica budu sretali jos, da ce taj faktor sve vise i vise igrati kljucnu ulogu. Jer je vidno koliko Federeru znaci a ujedno igra bolje na krilima te podrske a Djokovic sve manje i manje moze izvuci nesto za sebe iz tog navijanja. Tako da u sljedecim mecevima ne treba zanemariti taj faktor jer je vidno da Djokovicu smeta kad na prvi poen pocnu da padaju u trans.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostSamo sto publika nije protiv Djokovica samo kad igra protiv Rogera, kao sto bi se po ovim postovima moglo zakljuciti, nego je uglavnom protiv njega, protivnik je nebitan.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vladan View PostTo je samo tako na tribinama, sad pogledas drustvene mreze i razlika uopste nije tolika koliko bi se reklo po tribinama, Nadal i Djokovic nemaju sta da traze sto se tice podrske na samom mecu, ali u svijetu je ta razliak sigruno manja, cak sam siguran da Nadal ima vise navijaca globalno, a ne vjerujem da i Djokovic mnogo zaostaje, Indija i Kina su ogromna podrucja. Medjutim na tribinama je veci stalez, ljudi koji imaju novca, Zapad uglavnom, a tu je uglavnom Federerova podrska. Ipak to nije odlika pravog stanja, ali oni su uporni, kao zombiji koji idu i govore brains
ali kapiram da vam je lakse da se tesite da je Djokovic covek iz naroda, zak ojeg navijaju posteni, a za Feda navija zli zapad i snobovihttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DinoFC View PostRazumijem sta zelis reci ali nivo ludila i navijanja je ubjedljivo najveci kad igra protiv Rogera pa jebote ljudi u 2 gemu skacu ko ludi na duple greske. Cista anarhija a ne navijanje
Ali sad Djokovicevi navijaci svaki zvizduk analiziraju, sve gledaju, idu u krajnost...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Maxx-a View PostU najmanju ruku izjava nezrele osobe. Šta bi bilo kad bi bilo i da je bilo
Rekao je i da je publika bila "nice" . Što se iz meča nikako nije moglo zaključiti. Baš naprotiv.
Meni je mnogo teže pao poraz od Dominicasigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostAli juce uopste nije bio takav haos, jednostavno mec je bio previse jednosmeran za neki haos.
Ali sad Djokovicevi navijaci svaki zvizduk analiziraju, sve gledaju, idu u krajnost...
Comment
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Instagram
Federer 6.9m
Nadal 8.1m
Djokovic 6.3m
Twitter
Federer 12.7m
Nadal 15.7m
Djokovic 8.7m
Siguran sam da globalno Nadal ima najvise navijaca, ali veci stalez je Federerov. Djokovic se ipak dosta kasnije pojavio i bas u jeku rivalstva izmedju Federera i Nadala i opet uspio da uzme ogroman dio baze.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by DinoFC View PostPa pravili su haos onoliko koliko je bilo potrebno u odlucujucim momentima oba seta. Zbog manjka neizvjesnosti nije bilo to sve u punom kapacitetu. I definitivno Federerova penzija ce oznaciti kraj toj rulji, ali na to cemo morati sacekat.
Pa vidi sta su Medvedevu radili na USO, ali on je to odradio maestralno, najverovatnije ce navijati za njega kao ludi sledece godine.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostAli juce uopste nije bio takav haos, jednostavno mec je bio previse jednosmeran za neki haos..
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joker View PostZajebavas to po malo, drugarice? Pogledaj Larisin post na Novakovoj temi, vidi sta neki ljudi iz svijeta tenisa misle o tom "umjerenom haosu". Ocigledno je da su pravi ljubitelji tenisa bili uskraceni za vrhunski mec, jer je publika jednostavno bila bez trunke respekta prema jednom sampionu. Kada je glasniji aplauz na njegovu servis gresku nego na njegov dobar poen, sta tu ima vise da se prica.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joker View PostZajebavas to po malo, drugarice? Pogledaj Larisin post na Novakovoj temi, vidi sta neki ljudi iz svijeta tenisa misle o tom "umjerenom haosu". Ocigledno je da su pravi ljubitelji tenisa bili uskraceni za vrhunski mec, jer je publika jednostavno bila bez trunke respekta prema jednom sampionu. Kada je glasniji aplauz na njegovu servis gresku nego na njegov dobar poen, sta tu ima vise da se prica.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostNe zajebavam, vama je sad dobra publika samo ona koja je protiv Federera, a to se nikad nece desiti.sigpic
Comment
Comment