Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US Open 2019.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lijepo od Novaka.

    Comment


    • Kakva je zena Xisca ono je melem.
      Nadala je stvarno sreca pogledala u zivotu sa svih strana.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Stefan-kobe View Post
        Tripujem ondak, ali bar sam bio u pravo da ce biti slicno kao sa Nadalom.
        Nema to veze, Medvedeva je i Krajinovic odrao u IWu ove godine.
        Originally posted by Casiraghi
        Al bar nauci me drugoj da se dam da tebi nevernoj budem Emre Can
        Originally posted by Casiraghi
        Ti nikad neces biti kao Joel Matip.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxj_G6ExBTE
        Originally posted by Casiraghi
        Srecan Mane svima koji slave.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by NI View Post
          Jako cudna logika. WTF je daleko najavznij turnir poslije slemova. I Nadal ga nikada nije osvojio. To je znak da ima odredjeno ogranicenje. Njegovih 4 USO su fantastican uspjeh. Hard nije njegova podloga. Recimo da je 2017. i ove godine imao srece. Ali 2010. i 2013. je pobijedio Novaka, najboljeg na hardu.

          Te dvije godine je i dosao u finale WTF-a. Novak ga je pomeo 2013. a Federer ga je vies lako nego tesko dobio 2010.

          Da se WTF igra na sljaci, bila bi druga pjesma.

          Znacaj Olimpijade je u prvom redu simbolicki.
          Baš niste u pravu

          OLIMPIADA je jako bitna za VELIKU TROJKU

          NOle i Roger bi odham zamijenili GS titulu za olimpijsko zlato u singlu

          Precjenjujete WTF. Ovaj turnir se uvijek igra kraj godine kad su igrači iztrošeni + na podlogi koja najmanje odgovara Nadalu.

          Da se WTF igra na šljaci Rafa bi osvojio nekoliko tih turnira.

          Ove godine se igra DAVIS CUP u novom formatu - varianta kao neko SVJETSKO PRVENSTOV

          Rafa če svakako dati prednost tom turniru nego WTF-u

          Comment


          • Hahahah, OI da zamene sa slemom, pa ahahahahahahahahahahaha
            WTF je nebitan jer se ne igra na sljaci, inace bi se racunao i bio odmah iza slemova, a mastersi su bitni iako imamo tacno 0 na travi, a 3 na sljaci

            Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalk
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
              Hahahah, OI da zamene sa slemom, pa ahahahahahahahahahahaha
              WTF je nebitan jer se ne igra na sljaci, inace bi se racunao i bio odmah iza slemova, a mastersi su bitni iako imamo tacno 0 na travi, a 3 na sljaci

              Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalk

              S razlogom postoji 1 slem na travi i samo par turnira za zagrijavu prije njih.
              Igraci koji igraju "travaski" stil igre imaju zestoku prednost i na vecini mastersa na hardu, mozda ne kad je u pitanju Indian Wells jer je on bas spor sa visokim odskokom.
              Znaci na 6 od 9 mastersa ce prosjecan ofanzivac sa iole pristojnim servisem imati prednost nad prosjecnim sljakasem.
              Znaci zamislimo dva igraca, identicnog ukupnog kvaliteta ali jedan ima igru kao stvorenu za hc drugi za sljaku. KontaS?

              Fazon je sto je Rafa sve osim prosjecnog tako da ta pravila ne vaze.

              A za WTF se slazem. Jako vazan turnir koji se treba osvojiti, sve je samo nije beznacajan. Rafa ima problem sto dolazi na kraju godine kad je uglavnom iscrpljen, ni sa podlogom ni sa igracima sa kojima igra.
              Vidjecemo, ima jos sanse dovoljno.
              - 19 Grand Slams titles (84 titles)
              - Most titles won on a single GS, Masters and ATP 500 (12 RG, 11 MC, 11 Barcelona)
              - Winning 1 slam for 10 years in row (2005-2014)
              - Clay slam (2010), Summer slam (2013), 2x Channel slams (2008,2010)
              - Slams on 3 different surfaces in single year (2010), 2 slams on each surface
              - The highest winning ratio on single surface (clay - 92%)
              - Positive Grand Slam H2H with all big rivals
              - Single and double gold medal winner (2008, 2016)

              Comment


              • To je mozda vazilo 90tih, sad ce sljakas mnogo bolje da prodje na mastersima nego ekspert za travu jer je sve otislo dodjavola koliko je sporo.
                Pogledaj ovogodisnji W, Pelja stize do qf, to je stvarno presmesno.
                Pogledaj ovaj USO, toliko je sporo da su vineri misaona imenica, skoro svi igraci su rekli da ih podseca na sljaku.

                Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalk
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                  To je mozda vazilo 90tih, sad ce sljakas mnogo bolje da prodje na mastersima nego ekspert za travu jer je sve otislo dodjavola koliko je sporo.
                  Pogledaj ovogodisnji W, Pelja stize do qf, to je stvarno presmesno.
                  Pogledaj ovaj USO, toliko je sporo da su vineri misaona imenica, skoro svi igraci su rekli da ih podseca na sljaku.

                  Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalk
                  Ali ja i ne pricam o ekspretu za travu. To su najdosadniji igraci na turu i fala bogu da ih nema.Ni za Rogera ne mozes reci da je specijalista za travu...
                  Ja pricam za jednog kompletnog ofanzivca sa dobrim servisom ali i ostalim segmentima potrebnim za hc igru. Znaci za hard court igru.
                  Takav ce imati prednost na sljakasem u 6 od 9 slucajeva.
                  A imace prednost i na WB.

                  Fazon je sto ta igra zahtjeva vec mentalnu snagu i sto je danas manej takvih igraca.
                  - 19 Grand Slams titles (84 titles)
                  - Most titles won on a single GS, Masters and ATP 500 (12 RG, 11 MC, 11 Barcelona)
                  - Winning 1 slam for 10 years in row (2005-2014)
                  - Clay slam (2010), Summer slam (2013), 2x Channel slams (2008,2010)
                  - Slams on 3 different surfaces in single year (2010), 2 slams on each surface
                  - The highest winning ratio on single surface (clay - 92%)
                  - Positive Grand Slam H2H with all big rivals
                  - Single and double gold medal winner (2008, 2016)

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by topspinforehand View Post
                    Ali ja i ne pricam o ekspretu za travu. To su najdosadniji igraci na turu i fala bogu da ih nema.Ni za Rogera ne mozes reci da je specijalista za travu...
                    Ja pricam za jednog kompletnog ofanzivca sa dobrim servisom ali i ostalim segmentima potrebnim za hc igru. Znaci za hard court igru.
                    Takav ce imati prednost na sljakasem u 6 od 9 slucajeva.
                    A imace prednost i na WB.

                    Fazon je sto ta igra zahtjeva vec mentalnu snagu i sto je danas manej takvih igraca.
                    Nece, sljakas ce biti u prednosti jer ce da vraca do prekosutra, sve je toliko usporeno da ovaj nece moci da ga probije, morace da gadja same linije i vece su sanse da gresi nego da pogadja.

                    Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalk
                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                    sigpic

                    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                    with experience.

                    Comment


                    • +1
                      Ne znam ko se oko toga pita, ali sve podloge su danas prilično usporene. I sve više igrača se odlučuje na zonu 2-3-4 metra iza osnovne linije.
                      U finalu US Opena i najveći teniski stadion im je bio mali

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                        Nece, sljakas ce biti u prednosti jer ce da vraca do prekosutra, sve je toliko usporeno da ovaj nece moci da ga probije, morace da gadja same linije i vece su sanse da gresi nego da pogadja.

                        Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalk
                        Greska.
                        Finih ofanzivaca nema dovoljno, nemaju mentalnu sposobnost i fokus da gadjaju.Mogu kraci period pa onda grijese.
                        Braniti se jeste lakse, budi spreman fizicki i vracaj ih u teren.Samim tim imas vise dobrih defanzivaca nego ofanzivaca.
                        Zato je takav dojam.



                        Sent from my LG-M250 using Tapatalk
                        - 19 Grand Slams titles (84 titles)
                        - Most titles won on a single GS, Masters and ATP 500 (12 RG, 11 MC, 11 Barcelona)
                        - Winning 1 slam for 10 years in row (2005-2014)
                        - Clay slam (2010), Summer slam (2013), 2x Channel slams (2008,2010)
                        - Slams on 3 different surfaces in single year (2010), 2 slams on each surface
                        - The highest winning ratio on single surface (clay - 92%)
                        - Positive Grand Slam H2H with all big rivals
                        - Single and double gold medal winner (2008, 2016)

                        Comment


                        • Nastavak u Tadbas, ovo je USO tema
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by torpedo View Post
                            Kako je krenulo....potrajaće dok neko ne padne.
                            Da se igrao super tb neko bi pao a i ovako je malo falilo.

                            Bogami ti pogodi
                            Ne shvataj zivot preozbiljno ionako se ziv neces izvuci!

                            Comment


                            • Da i dan danas postoji bitna razlika izmedju sljake i HC koliko god da puno ljudi relativizuje pokazuje npr. Hugo Dellien a od boljih i Thiem (njegovi rezultati na hardu mozda nisu uzasni, ali u poredjenju sa sljakom su uzas)

                              Comment


                              • Thiem je ove godine bio bolestan, a prosle godine je pokazao sta moze na USO, a Delien, pa daj neki malo bolji primer
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                                sigpic

                                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                                with experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X