Bojana, shvatam animozitet, ali nekako ne ide da se bunis protiv omalovazavanja Vavrinke i njegovih titula, a onda omalovazavas Rafine.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
US Open 2019.
Collapse
X
-
Federer mora da je igrao sa slomljenom nogom ili rukom kad je izgubio od Dimitrova, posto do polovine prvog seta to je bila smehoteka od meca. Paradoksalno sad je jedini koji moze zaustaviti Nadala Dimitrov
Ali Medjed ce da se sali sa Bugarinomsigpic
Comment
-
Meni je taj izraz ni kriv ni duzan bezvezan, jer gore je biti kriv i duzan. Reci lepo imao je srece sa zrebom. Pa sta onda, desava se. Ne pobedjuju uvek favoriti, tu su i povrede.... to je car sporta. Uzgred on jos nije osvojio titulu. Sacekaj malo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by skeptik View PostMeni je taj izraz ni kriv ni duzan bezvezan, jer gore je biti kriv i duzan. Reci lepo imao je srece sa zrebom. Pa sta onda, desava se. Ne pobedjuju uvek favoriti, tu su i povrede.... to je car sporta. Uzgred on jos nije osvojio titulu. Sacekaj malo.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Nadal je na putu do svojih 18 Grand slam titula 13 puta morao pobijeđivati nekog iz dvojke Federer/Novak. Samo pet puta je imao luksuz da osvoji titulu, a ne igra protiv njih.
Što se mene tiče da i narednih pet puta dođe do titule bez sastajanja sa njima, ne bih mu ništa zamjerio.Last edited by Prle!; 04-09-19, 12:18.“It's no accident, I think, that tennis uses the language of life. Advantage, service, fault, break, love, the basic elements of tennis are those of everyday existence, because every match is a life in miniature. Points become games become sets become tournaments, and it's all so tightly connected that any point can become the turning point. It reminds me of the way seconds become minutes become hours, and any hour can be our finest. Or darkest. It's our choice.”
Comment
-
Nema veze ni to što pišemo ovdje, pa eto, pišemo.“It's no accident, I think, that tennis uses the language of life. Advantage, service, fault, break, love, the basic elements of tennis are those of everyday existence, because every match is a life in miniature. Points become games become sets become tournaments, and it's all so tightly connected that any point can become the turning point. It reminds me of the way seconds become minutes become hours, and any hour can be our finest. Or darkest. It's our choice.”
Comment
-
Ono sto su mene svi napali kad sam rekla za Nadala, a Wolf nikohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
Comment