Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cincinnati 2019

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    E bravo mu ga, bas je car! I sad, naravno, nema pomjeranja u zrijebi, vec Novak i Fedja ostaju "zarobljeni" u istoj polovini? E Rafa, Rafa.. tacno te necu vise zaliti kad ponovo budes u kanalu...

    Comment


    • #47
      pa dobro,novak prvo treba da stigne do feda...viš kako se odjedanput volu

      nek pobedi nika i meni puna kapa,bice gadna sprdačina ako izgubi
      Wizard

      Comment


      • #48
        Po meni bi za ovakva odustajanja trebale da budu velike kazne, u Nadalovom slucaju ili par stotina bodova ili veca novcana kazna(Izrazena u desetinama hiljada evra). Nije prvi put da ovo radi.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by 147 View Post
          Po meni bi za ovakva odustajanja trebale da budu velike kazne, u Nadalovom slucaju ili par stotina bodova ili veca novcana kazna(Izrazena u desetinama hiljada evra). Nije prvi put da ovo radi.
          Ima pravo jer ispunjuje uslov da bira na kom turniru moze da nastupi.
          OVAKO

          Comment


          • #50
            Jel Janko igra samo dubl.

            Comment


            • #51
              Sta je sa Serenom? Zasto predala juce i da li igra Sinsi?

              Da Janko samo dubl sa Novakom drugi mec valjda na No.3 posle jednog singla

              Edit: posle meca Garin -Manarino
              sigpic

              Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
              But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by 147 View Post
                Po meni bi za ovakva odustajanja trebale da budu velike kazne, u Nadalovom slucaju ili par stotina bodova ili veca novcana kazna(Izrazena u desetinama hiljada evra). Nije prvi put da ovo radi.
                Ima pravo da odustane, druga je stvar sto bi bilo fer da je to uradio pre zreba.
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • #53
                  pa jeste fer...prema nekome
                  Wizard

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                    Ima pravo da odustane, druga je stvar sto bi bilo fer da je to uradio pre zreba.
                    Znam da ima prava. Da se to ponekada desi nista ne bih rekao, ali desava se precesto. Mrzi me da brojim koliko puta, ali sigurno nekih 10tak u poslednje 2-3 godine.

                    Tako je zeznuo Novaka i Rodzera u Parizu, jer verujem da bi neko od njih osvojio turnir da nisu igrali onako tezak mec u SF. Bas se radi o tome da nije fer. Doduse, verujem da mu je to i deo strategije.

                    Inace Kobe, sto se Montreala tice Nadal je zasluzeno razbio Medvedeva, na to sam mislio. Drugo je nesto raspored, ali sam siguran da bi sa onakovm igrom pocistio i Monfisa.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Pa upravo to, deo strategije je da bude u zrebu da bi postojala sansa da Djokovic i Fed budu u istoj polovini, jer je ocigledno da juri no.1 na kraju godine.
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                      sigpic

                      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                      with experience.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                        Pa upravo to, deo strategije je da bude u zrebu da bi postojala sansa da Djokovic i Fed budu u istoj polovini, jer je ocigledno da juri no.1 na kraju godine.
                        Kakve veze ima to sto juri No. 1 sa time da smesti Rodzeru i Novaku ? Smestio bi im on i da ima mnogo manje poena. Kao sto je nama navijacima cilj da nas igrac uvek pobedjuje ( a ona dva skoro uvek gube iako je to nemoguce),
                        tako je i Rafi uvek cilj da im namesti kada moze.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by 147 View Post
                          Mrzi me da brojim koliko puta, ali sigurno nekih 10tak u poslednje 2-3 godine.
                          Netacno.
                          Druga stvar, sad u ovom slucaju, naravno da je namerno uradjeno, bitno mu je da je 2 nositelj na USO, bitan mu je i no.1 na kraja sezone, tako da sacekao je da vidi dali ce osvojiti titulu u Montrealu pa da vidi dal treba da odustane il ne. Ovo je idealan scenario za njega od svakog aspekta, ne vidim nista lose u ovo, sasvim negovo legitimno pravo.
                          OVAKO

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Pa ima veze, ovako njih dvojica mogu u SF vec da se sretnu i porazeni ide sa samo 360 poena, jos ako je to Djokovic, Nadla je prvi u race-u pred USO.
                            A da se on povukao, ova dvojica mogu tek u finalu i to je razlika jer onda osvajaj 1000 tj. 600 poena i on 100% nije vise prvi u race-u.
                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                            sigpic

                            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                            with experience.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Nema to niđe veze. Čovek odustao jer sumnja da može izdržati, da je ispao rano igrao bi. Logika je da igra jer do finala ne sreće Novaka i Rodžera.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Igrao bi i da nije osvojio, jer bi onda jurio dovoljan broj poena da bude no.2 na USO, to je bio njegov cilj.
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                                sigpic

                                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                                with experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X