Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wimbledon 2019 (glavna tema)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by DinoFC View Post
    To sto Federer nije osvoji ove godine AO, ne znaci da je usporen. Pariz strasno spor, ti nisi onda gledala mec u kojem Djokovic nije mogao brejknut Federera u 3 seta hahahahaha Al to je dvorana opet prica za sebe neovisno od podloge. Usporen i Sinsinati a ja Federer izgubio prosle godine hahahahaha
    Jeste, imas podatke da je Sinsi usporen, a Pariz je prespor vec godinama
    Bio je brz pre 10 godina, posle toga nisu smeli vise takvu podlogu da stave, sigurno su neki kukali
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
      Jeste, imas podatke da je Sinsi usporen, a Pariz je prespor vec godinama
      Bio je brz pre 10 godina, posle toga nisu smeli vise takvu podlogu da stave, sigurno su neki kukali
      A kako to da nemas podatke bas je ubrzan Paris i WTF u zadnjih par godina, kako za to nemas podatke a to je slucaj

      Comment


      • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
        Kad ces shvatiti da mene nervira sto je sve postalo isto, sporo, sporo i jos sporije, nema raznovrsnosti, sve je toliko isto, da su cak i par turnira koji su bili brzi usporili.
        Sad imaju ovu trojicu, ali to nece dugo trajati, pa zamisli kakav ce tenis da bude kad ova deca stvarno dodju i budu nosili tenis...booooooooooooooring
        Ali zasto organizatori to rade? Koja magicna ruka ih tera na takve sulude poteze po tebi?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by DinoFC View Post
          A kako to da nemas podatke bas je ubrzan Paris i WTF u zadnjih par godina, kako za to nemas podatke a to je slucaj
          WTF oscilira, nisu konstanti sa brzinom uopste, od medium slow do medium, mozda je jednu godinu bio medium fast, ali nisam sigurna.
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

          sigpic

          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
          with experience.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
            Cekaj koji deo ne shvatas
            da li je raznovrsnije kad imas RG gde moras da igras duge poene pa onda odes na W gde moras da igras kratke poene i S&V ili posle RGa odes na W gde igras isto kao na RGu?
            Da se igra isto kao na RG Nadal bi sada bio na pragu tridesetog Slema. A njemu ono proslogodisnje polufinale najbolji rezultat u poslednjih 8 godina.
            Govoris neistine - prosto je.
            sigpic

            Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again

            U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
            Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….

            Comment


            • Originally posted by skeptik View Post
              Ali zasto organizatori to rade? Koja magicna ruka ih tera na takve sulude poteze po tebi?
              Da bi isti igraci stalno bili u zavrsnicama, da bi se jurili rekordi, jer se samo o tome prica i da bi se to hajpovalo sto je moguce vise, jer znaju da kad ova trojica odu, nova generacija nece ni prici njihovim rekordima.
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

              sigpic

              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
              with experience.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Sandugp View Post
                Da se igra isto kao na RG Nadal bi sada bio na pragu tridesetog Slema. A njemu ono proslogodisnje polufinale najbolji rezultat u poslednjih 8 godina.
                Govoris neistine - prosto je.
                Ili bi Thiem prosao bar jednom u dve godine prvo kolo.
                sloboda ili ništa

                Comment


                • Jedva cekam nove raspave oko brzine podloge kada dodje USO.
                  Dayman (a-a-ah...)
                  Fighter of the Nightman (a-a-ah...)
                  Champion of the sun (a-a-ah...)
                  You're a master of karate and friendship
                  For everyone

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                    Da bi isti igraci stalno bili u zavrsnicama, da bi se jurili rekordi, jer se samo o tome prica i da bi se to hajpovalo sto je moguce vise, jer znaju da kad ova trojica odu, nova generacija nece ni prici njihovim rekordima.
                    Znas da je Nadal u posljednjih 8 godina, osvoji 2 slema van sljake a RG 6 puta. Sta to tebi govori?! Znam da mu taj podatak ne ide u prilog al moram sta cu da ti dokazem da nije sve jednolicno kao sto ti predstavljas

                    Comment


                    • Usporavanje nije ok al zato kad na AO dvostruko ubrzaju podlogu kao 2017 tad je ok, sasvim normalno.

                      Trava je trava, ne moze biti spora, loptice su presudne. I meni se vizuelno cini sporije nego ranije, al nista skandalozno. Eto Kveri je jednom izgubio servis do juce, ako je bila spora podloga izgubio bi on visestruko svoje servise do QF-a.

                      Ok su podloge i ne kukajte bezvezno.
                      OVAKO

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                        Da bi isti igraci stalno bili u zavrsnicama, da bi se jurili rekordi, jer se samo o tome prica i da bi se to hajpovalo sto je moguce vise, jer znaju da kad ova trojica odu, nova generacija nece ni prici njihovim rekordima.
                        Koji to isti igraci? Novak i Nadal?

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by DinoFC View Post
                          Znas da je Nadal u posljednjih 8 godina, osvoji 2 slema van sljake a RG 6 puta. Sta to tebi govori?! Znam da mu taj podatak ne ide u prilog al moram sta cu da ti dokazem da nije sve jednolicno kao sto ti predstavljas
                          Pa sta jos treba da urade, da zabrane igracima da igraju protiv Nadala, da bi on dolazio do zavrsnica
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by DinoFC View Post
                            Znas da je Nadal u posljednjih 8 godina, osvoji 2 slema van sljake a RG 6 puta. Sta to tebi govori?! Znam da mu taj podatak ne ide u prilog al moram sta cu da ti dokazem da nije sve jednolicno kao sto ti predstavljas


                            Da ga je Nolo izdominirao.

                            *


                            *bolja verzija poruke
                            Dayman (a-a-ah...)
                            Fighter of the Nightman (a-a-ah...)
                            Champion of the sun (a-a-ah...)
                            You're a master of karate and friendship
                            For everyone

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                              Pa sta jos treba da urade, da zabrane igracima da igraju protiv Nadala, da bi on dolazio do zavrsnica
                              Lose zakljucivanje, al nema veze.

                              Comment


                              • e jbg. Dino, upozorim te i obrisem poruku, ti nastavis, odmori malo
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                                sigpic

                                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                                with experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X