Moze anketa, lobiracu za Govedaricu i garantujem da cemo izaci kao pobjednici. I bez zajebancije za klasu mi je bolji od Viskovica trenutno, pritom se vidi da prati tenis konstantno, sto se za Viskovica vise ne moze reci. A on je pcoeo da se drzi fudbala, ko je juce slusao Radojevica shvatio je da on ne moze da bude medju najboljim fudbalskim komentatorima. Treba da ponovo pocne da prati tenis i misli samo o tenisu kao nekad.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nitto ATP Finals London 2018.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Mr. Wolf View PostRealno je, taman da Novak budzi h2h protiv Rodzera.sigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vladan View PostMoze anketa, lobiracu za Govedaricu i garantujem da cemo izaci kao pobjednici. I bez zajebancije za klasu mi je bolji od Viskovica trenutno, pritom se vidi da prati tenis konstantno, sto se za Viskovica vise ne moze reci. A on je pcoeo da se drzi fudbala, ko je juce slusao Radojevica shvatio je da on ne moze da bude medju najboljim fudbalskim komentatorima. Treba da ponovo pocne da prati tenis i misli samo o tenisu kao nekad.
i da, ritern iz 2011., ako njega ne uspe da spomene tokom meca, mislim da je bolestan narednih 5 danahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostGovedarica uopste nije dobar komentator, previse govori, premalo cuti, stalno govori kako je neko zavrteo ili nije zavrteo lopticu, to mu je citav recnik
i da, ritern iz 2011., ako njega ne uspe da spomene tokom meca, mislim da je bolestan narednih 5 dana
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ivan_PG View PostOtvori ti anketu,ona ce dati konacan sud.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostGovedarica uopste nije dobar komentator, previse govori, premalo cuti, stalno govori kako je neko zavrteo ili nije zavrteo lopticu, to mu je citav recnik
i da, ritern iz 2011., ako njega ne uspe da spomene tokom meca, mislim da je bolestan narednih 5 danasigpic
Always somewhere Miss you where I've been I'll be back to love you again
U crnim rupama možeš ludo da se zezaš. Da lebdiš iznad zemlje. Da slušaš rock ´n´ roll.Dozivaš kišu.
Ili da mazneš neku lepu ribu. Samo je bezveze kada se probudiš….
Comment
-
Bolje mi je komentator koji ima taj komentatorski duh kao Visko i razume tenis i bitne trenutke i sta da kaze,nego komentator koji je u stanju citavi tenisku istoriju da mi kaze,da mi kaze kako se pravilno izvodi Fh Bh,da mi kaze ko je udario retern 2003 na Ao...
Dobro je biti informisan komantator,ali jos bolje imati taj talenat za komentarisanje kao Visko,zato je on 2 koplja iznad svih
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sandugp View PostZnanje (tenisko) ima. To mu niko osporiti ne moze. Elokvencije mu nedostaje, fond reci mu je siromasan. Najbitnije za komentatora (a i uopsteno) je da sa sto manje reci sto vise kaze. Njemu to ne polazi za rukom. Odatle i cinjenica da previse prica.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Cinjenica je da u Srbiji ne postoji neki "ekstra dobar" teniski komentator. I Viskovic i Govedarica su dobri pa i Noletov kum ovaj mali kako se zvase.. Ali im je glavna mana to sto posle nekog vremena postaju dosadni. Viskovic ponavlja stalno jedne te iste stvari i fali mu malo te neke energije.. Komentator mora pre svega da bude zanimljiv i da se ne ponavlja, a uz to strucnos mu je neophodna. Ne moze neko da prenosi 5 razlicitih sportova i da bude nesto narocito strucan u svakom od njih jer tu ima previse gradiva.. Ali eto, uvek vise volim da slusam nase nego ove talijane ovde koji nisu nista bolji, cak umeju da budu vrlo naporni i nestrucni..
Comment
-
Ovo je bas porazavajuce za Cilica
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
Comment