Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pariz 2018.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by miloolja View Post
    I pripazi malo na revnik, pogotovu prema zenskim clanicama.
    Dobro, onda cu i ja od sad da pocinjem postove sa: "Vidi se koliko ne znas..", time cemo unaprijediti kvalitet rasprave.

    Comment


    • Jel to ona dupla ram-zica lopta
      sigpic

      Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
      But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Joker View Post
        Dobro, onda cu i ja od sad da pocinjem postove sa: "Vidi se koliko ne znas..", time cemo unaprijediti kvalitet rasprave.
        Pa sigurno neces na tvoj nacin unaprediti raspravu
        I da Bojana ne govori clanovima da nemaju pojma, zaboravih to -.-
        sigpic

        Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
        But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.

        Comment


        • Pa kad ne zna, kako da mu kazem, sam je rekao da je otisao na atp sajt da pogleda h2h
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

          sigpic

          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
          with experience.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by miloolja View Post
            Jel to ona dupla ram-zica lopta
            pa nebitno, u tenisu se gleda zamah a ovde je bio jedan, tako da ne moze biti dupli kontakt
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

            sigpic

            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
            with experience.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
              Pa kad ne zna, kako da mu kazem, sam je rekao da je otisao na atp sajt da pogleda h2h
              Svaka cast Rodzu,moram ti ga pohvalit.Drzao se muski,kao djecak trckara po terenu.

              Comment


              • Meč je bio dobar i kvalitetan mada po meni ne meni bez te neke note epskog.
                Zbog Novakove realizacije od 0% na brejk prilike imali smo viđeni tok meča. Nije sporno da je Rodžer imao odličan serverski dan međutim Novak je morao i mogao biti bolji u tom segmentu. Na stranu što je i sreća okrenula leđa u dve prilike ali ona nije bila presudna u situacijama gde se samo on pitao kao recimo kod one fh paralele koja završi u debelom autu. Bar 3,4 puta bio je na loptici uprkos dobrim Rodžerovim servisima, imao lepe šanse za dobar ritern ali ih je redom proćerdao. Da je u tim situacijama imao koncentraciju poput one u dva tb-a meč bi bio rešen ranije.
                Sumnjam da Rodžer može bolje od prikazanog dok Novak sigurno može.
                sigpic

                Comment


                • Roger moze bolje od ovog, pre svega kod riterna, koji je poslednja kockica koja se uklopi u njegovoj igri kad se vraca u formu
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                  Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                  sigpic

                  Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                  with experience.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by NI View Post
                    Vidis, ja mislim da je na onoj BL kad se iznervirao imao sansi. On je Federerove 1. servise u T te dubine vracao citavo vrijeme meca. Zato se i iznervirao.

                    Dvije greske koje su uslijedile sam pripisao Novakovom nedostatku zelje za pobjedom. Ako se nesto moze zamjeriti Novaku, to je da pritisak na Federera nije bio konstantan. Poslije propustenih prilika bi pritisak padao. Najgori pad je bio u 12. gemu 2. seta. Tada je dzabe dao svoj servi. Inace, to nije vazilo u TB-ovima. U TB-ima su Novakov intenzitet i fokus bili besprekorni. TB cesto odluci sreca. U prvom TB je ona bila na Federerovoj strani, ali to nije dekuraziralo Novaka, njegov fokus je presudio. U drugom je sreca bila na Novakovoj strani i sve je islo lako.

                    Federer je cijelo vrijeme igrao na maksimumu. (red lining) I to uspjesno. 54 vinera 52 neiznudjene. Kad igras tako ima grubih promasaja. A Novak nije igra na maksim. Gotovo je igra bez BH paralele. Nije bio siguran u nju. Rodzer je dobio vise poena BH parelelom nego Novak. Rodzer je imao efikasnost 63.6%. Tj. 63.6% poena koje je on odluci je odlucio u svoju korist. (To je za Federera nisko. On obicno ima 70%. To je znak da je igrao na maksimumu) A Novak je imao 71.4%.
                    Jaaaooo pa ti si ono rekao kako nema zelju za pobedom?!?!
                    E tu si bas omanuo, moram da ti kazem, nijednim potezom to nije pokazivao, naprotiv, a to sto mubje fokus koji je maltene bio na najvisem novou, dovoljno govori, zapravo fokus obojice.

                    Ja sam i rekla da se iznervirao zbog loseg riterna i zato polupao reket.
                    A greske nakon tog izjednacenja, kao i nekoliko puta pre toga meni su govorili samo jedno...da se iznervirao zbog propustenih sansi, kao sto je bila i ta na 40:40 i dozvolio da mu fokus ipak malo padne, da bi se odmah u svom servis gemu vratio.
                    sigpic

                    Pablo Sandoval: A guy can change anything.. his face, his home, his family, his girlfriend, his religion, his God.
                    But there's one thing he can't change... he can't change his passion.

                    Comment


                    • Ako Rodžer može bolje onda Novak može puuuno bolje
                      sigpic

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
                        Pa kad ne zna, kako da mu kazem, sam je rekao da je otisao na atp sajt da pogleda h2h
                        Pa ja nisam folirant, od mene ces iskren odgovor uvijek dobiti. Znao sam da su igrali USO jos kad Fedja nije imao ni slema, ali sam za zadnje njihove okrsaje mislio da su ipak bili par godina ranije. To sve nije razlog da se omalovazavamo sujetnim: "Nemas pojma.. nista ne znas.." i sta ti ja znam. To vise prilici sitnim dusama, ne pravim navijacima. No.. tvoja volja, gospodare.. čini što ti volja...

                        Comment


                        • Ljudi Federer bi sad trebao da igra sa Borgom i Vilanderom one penzionerske turnire.Je li realno da neko u te godine onako razbija.Ocigledno ima dobru genetiku.Uzima on Vimbldon iduce godine.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Joker View Post
                            Pa ja nisam folirant, od mene ces iskren odgovor uvijek dobiti. Znao sam da su igrali USO jos kad Fedja nije imao ni slema, ali sam za zadnje njihove okrsaje mislio da su ipak bili par godina ranije. To sve nije razlog da se omalovazavamo sujetnim: "Nemas pojma.. nista ne znas.." i sta ti ja znam. To vise prilici sitnim dusama, ne pravim navijacima. No.. tvoja volja, gospodare.. čini što ti volja...
                            Da ti nisi nastupio toliko samouvereno ni moj odgovor ne bi bio takav, akcija-reakcija

                            Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalk
                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                            Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                            sigpic

                            Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                            with experience.

                            Comment


                            • "Samouvjereno" sam rekao da je Federer bio young gun tada i Bokica se razjarila.. dabogda....

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Joker View Post
                                "Samouvjereno" sam rekao da je Federer bio young gun tada i Bokica se razjarila.. dabogda....
                                Pa normalno, moras da znas sta pises, da imas tacne informacije, a ne da ides na fazon ako prodje, prodje

                                Sent from my MI 6 using Tapatalk
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                                sigpic

                                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                                with experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X