Tweet
Stefko de iskomentiraj najtezi poraz Nadalove karijere na AO, nakon kojeg je osvojio 2GSa, nije li se trebao raspasti nakon onog uzasnog poraza.
-
-
Znala sam da ovo nije tacno, ali konacno sam nasla i statistiku, Fed je bio bolji u svim razmenamaOriginally posted by MareLFC View Post
He was 38-31 in front in the points up to 4 strokes, and the advantage in the mid-range rallies from 5 to 8 shots was even bigger, winning 17 out of 26 points.
Only 10 points reached the 9th shot and Federer didn't stay behind in them as well, taking 6 and losing 4 to outplay Nadal fair and square.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.Comment
Comment