Originally posted by Vladan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Australian open 2014 (AO)
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by AIRBORNE View PostMa dzaba je to,dok se na svojo kozi ne oseti dzba gledanje i samo pokazivanje.
Evo ga i Ljubicicev tvit posle finala:
Ivan Ljubicic @theljubicic
I wonder how many players went: "oh, so it can be done!" . Big congrats to @stanwawrinka . Fantastic achievementhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostNe slazem se, po meni je Rogerova aura nepobedivosti bila prvi put ozbiljno narusena 2007. kad je pukao 2 puta od Kanjasa i tada je pocelo sve da se menja. Tada je sigurno dosta igraca pomislilo, ako moze ovaj da ga dobije, zasto ne mogu ja, nisam ja losiji.
Evo ga i Ljubicicev tvit posle finala:>>>BrojimIzbrojao sam sate, minute, sekunde do pogleda na Mourinja u dresu MANCHESTER UNITED-a ! <<<
Comment
-
Originally posted by NI View PostDusane,
Mi se jako mnogo slazemo, barem 90%. Ja cu pobrojati onih 10% pa da zavrsimo:
1.
Stan je bolje takticki igrao protiv Novaka nego ikad prije. Samim tim je igaro bolje nego prosle godine. Doduse i Novak je bio bolji ove godine. Pricamo o nijensama.
2.
Ne slazemo se oko definicije choking.
"Znam da ovo moram dobiti, a bojim se da necu", znaci da padas beza razloga
"sta cu, sve se urotilo protiv mene" to je poslije svih linija koje Vavrinka pogodio ranije (pogledaj brej vavrinkim u drugom setu, pogadje bolje nego danas, i u prvi u trecem setu, jedna mreza i tri linije.) i miss-hit-a. shampion mora da prevazidje to, ali to jos uvijek nije choking
3.
Jedina stvar koja vodi vodu na tvoj mlin da je bio choking je sljedeca: Novak je imao bolje brojeve, doduse malo bolje, dakle bio je bolji i izgubio je. Medjutim dok igras nije uvijek lako zanati statistiku. Oni nemja internet.
2. Koji je razlog Novakovog onolikog pada u petom setu koji je imao u rukama i kontrolisao ga vecinom stvarno ne znam, a i da ga znam ne bih mogao da ga razumem. Zato i to podrazumevam pod choking. Onaj pad koji ne mogu da razumem. Da su to bili Mahut ili Chardy, pa i ne bi bio choking.
3. Imao je Novak nekoliko poena vise, ne secam se, cini mi se 3, tu se isto vidi to rasporedjivanje poena i ne koriscenje prilika, stvarno nerazumljivo za mene.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AIRBORNE View PostPa zar ti Bojana da pomazes da tvoj "miljenik" ne skida odma` gace e svasta cu jos procitati.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
AIR, editovao si post
pa on skida gace protiv svih osim protiv Feda, red je i da se to promeni, tako da ne vidim gde je problem u mom postuhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojanaBG View PostAIR, editovao si post
pa on skida gace protiv svih osim protiv Feda, red je i da se to promeni, tako da ne vidim gde je problem u mom postu>>>BrojimIzbrojao sam sate, minute, sekunde do pogleda na Mourinja u dresu MANCHESTER UNITED-a ! <<<
Comment
-
Wawa od 12.11.2013 ima svoju temu, do pocetka AO imao stranicu i po` a od tada do sada 8. str. samo sto nije.
Spice Girls su male mace za Stanetovu rapidnu popularnost.>>>BrojimIzbrojao sam sate, minute, sekunde do pogleda na Mourinja u dresu MANCHESTER UNITED-a ! <<<
Comment
-
Bandwagoneri
Prvi put u karijeri osvaja dvije titule u sezoni, sesta titula u karijeri. Prvi put u karijeri pobijedio prvog reketa svijeta, ima i 15 poraza. Brugera zadnji dobio prvog i drugog reketa svijeta na putu do titule, RG 1993. Drugi iza Ivanisevica kojem je trebalo najvise Slamova da dodje do titule, 36. Slam, Ivanisevic iz 48. pokusaja. Prvi igrac van TOP 4 koji osvaja AO jos od Tomasa Johansona koji je osvojio titulu 2002. kao 16. nosilac, 18 igrac svijeta.
Realno zakljucak se sam namecesigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vladan View PostBandwagoneri
Prvi put u karijeri osvaja dvije titule u sezoni, sesta titula u karijeri. Prvi put u karijeri pobijedio prvog reketa svijeta, ima i 15 poraza. Brugera zadnji dobio prvog i drugog reketa svijeta na putu do titule, RG 1993. Drugi iza Ivanisevica kojem je trebalo najvise Slamova da dodje do titule, 36. Slam, Ivanisevic iz 48. pokusaja. Prvi igrac van TOP 4 koji osvaja AO jos od Tomasa Johansona koji je osvojio titulu 2002. kao 16. nosilac, 18 igrac svijeta.
Realno zakljucak se sam namecehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y
Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing
sigpic
Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
with experience.
Comment
Comment