Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Opste teniske diskusije,vijesti...

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Procitajte ceo niz, a koga mrzi, ukratko:
    -sledece nedelje ce otkazati Wimbledon, njima to nije problem jer imaju osiguranje u slucaju pandemije pa su pokriveni novcano, a i zbog trave nemoguce je organizovati turnir u septembru i kasnije
    -ispljuvao je RG i njihov potez, ako sam cak dobro razumela moguce je da RG ne donosi poene uopste, jer su sada svi protiv njih

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

    Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

    sigpic

    Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
    with experience.

    Comment


    • Kako je krenulo mogao bi Novak završiti godinu bez poraza

      Comment


      • Originally posted by bojanaBG View Post
        -ispljuvao je RG i njihov potez, ako sam cak dobro razumela moguce je da RG ne donosi poene uopste, jer su sada svi protiv njih
        Poeni jesu bitni, ali ipak.. slem je slem.

        Comment


        • Jedno relevantno i racionalno mišljenje

          Rodik: Ako se Novak izjednači po Slemovima, on je GOAT



          http://sportklub.rs/Tenis/ATP/a32807...n-je-GOAT.html


          I jedan komentar sa kojim se slažem

          Biće nemoguće osporiti mu zvanje GOAT!
          Jer ima bolji medjuskor sa obojicom, jedini osvojene sve Masters turnire koji se igraju, jedini koji je vezao 4 GS trofeja u nizu (jedini koji je bio u prilici i da to i ponovi, 4 u nizu), uz Nadala definitivno je igrao u najjačoj eri tenisa (RF je gomilu GS trofeja zakačio tokom perioda kad su Pit i Andre bili pred penzijom, a Nole, Rafa, Endi...još uvek klinci, koliko god se ovo ne dopadalo njegovim navijačima da čuju).
          Premašio je odavno sva naša očekivanja, postao je legenda tenisa i sporta uopšte još pre nekoliko godina... Neka ga samo zdravlje posluži, biće tu još GS trofeja, a možda i te OI. [emoji119]
          Last edited by dekkard; 30-03-20, 20:39.
          “La vostra fama è come il fiore, che nasce e muore, e si secca allo stesso sole che gli ha dato vita dall'acerba terra"

          Comment


          • Federer ce, sve su prilike, i protiv Tima imati jako los negativni skor. Pa se ni u ludilu ne mogu porediti.. Hocu da kazem da jeste malo zeznuto to kad te neko leši na zalasku karijere.

            Comment


            • On je pre tri godine osvojio W, znači bilo je rezona da nastavi da igra. Kao što njega sad leši Nole i on je lešio kad je bio u najboljim godinama a Rafa i Nole tek stupali na veliku scenu.
              “La vostra fama è come il fiore, che nasce e muore, e si secca allo stesso sole che gli ha dato vita dall'acerba terra"

              Comment


              • Nadal 1 GS, Federer 4 GS, onaj ko kaze da se ovaj naosvajao slemova bez konkurencije nema blage veze sa tenisom i ima pamcenje zlatne ribice, diskvalifikuje sam sebe iz dalje ozbiljne price.
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                sigpic

                Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                with experience.

                Comment


                • Federer je uzeo 9 GS do kraja 2006. Novak je prvi put ozbiljno krenuo od 2007
                  Nadal je 2005 i 2006 bio ozbiljan samo na šljaci. Takođe i 2007 je uzeo tri GS a Novak je tek tad počeo ozbiljnije da igra. Kasnije kako su Novak i Rafa podizali svoj nivo tako je Roger uzimao sve manje i manje.
                  To se i vidi na ovoj slici. Do 2009 Roger uzima skoro sve svoje titule. Nakon toga kreće jača konkurencija pa su i titule ređe.

                  Послато са SM-G975F помоћу Тапатока

                  Comment


                  • Ma, pusti Bojanu sto prica, to nidje veze.. Federer u mladosti nije imao ni jednog dominatora za konkurenciju. Jedino ako cemo Agasija da racunamo, ali opet ni on nije stariji od njega 5-6 godina, vec cijelih 11. Pa je opet gubio od njega kad je imao 20-21 godinu, bjezi...

                    Comment


                    • Ma pusti Jokera, sta prica, nigde veze. Djokovic poceo da osvaja tek kad je Federer usao u tridesete, a ne postoji mlada generacija da ga izaziva.

                      Svaka prica ima 2 strane
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                      Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                      sigpic

                      Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                      with experience.

                      Comment


                      • Jes, sve se vrti oko tvoga Fedje. Novak je sve vrijeme imao i vrsnjaka, ljutu zmiju iz Spanije. Federer niti to, niti zrelijeg dominatora.

                        Comment


                        • Kog vrsnjaka?
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                          Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                          sigpic

                          Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                          with experience.

                          Comment


                          • Nadala, Bokice, Nadala... Godinu dana starijeg, racunaj vrsnjaka.

                            Comment


                            • Taj vrsnjak je vec 2005. imao osvojen slem, a 2010. imao karijerni slem, dok je Djokovic do tada imao samo 1 slem.
                              Mozda je po godinama blizi Djokovicu, ali je po teniskim godinama blizi Federeru.
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfzsyKXSs-Y

                              Here's the most remarkable thing to me about Federer: Seems to me that the more you know about tennis, the more amazed you are by the guy. If you know nothing at all about tennis, he's amazing. If you know a little something about tennis—maybe you have played a few times in your life—he's more amazing. If you know a little more about tennis—maybe you played in high school and once had illusions of becoming a pro—he's even MORE amazing. And if you were a great player—if you are a McEnroe or a Connors or a Jim Courier—then Federer is preposterously amazing

                              sigpic

                              Don't argue with idiots. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you...
                              with experience.

                              Comment


                              • Pa ti sad muti vodu koliko hoces, ali ostaje cinjenica da je Novak imao dominatora iz svoje generacije, kao i jednog zrelijeg. Sto znaci da se tokom cijele karijere rvao sa najjacima. Federer je imao tu privilegiju da u mladosti nije imao dominatora uopste.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X